Assess the Arguments in Favor of the Greater Use of Direct Democracy in the Uk Essay

Direct democracy is the purest construct of democracy and it is when the people of the state are containly consulted by the judicature on issues. The people themselves have the the choice and rear influence the government. This merchantman be achieved through referendums. One argument for the greater design of postulate democracy is that is can increase legitimacy as the government is getting comport consent from the people through such methods such as referendums.Another reason is that if the government is spit on an issue it can hold a referendum for the people to choose, so the people have a direct influence on government and such samples of this include the AV referendum, and the 1975 EU membership referendum. Direct democracy not only supports and strengthens verificatory membership but it also educates people about politics and study political issues.However there are arguments against the greater use if direct democracy is that some issues can be hard and too dif ficult for some people to understand in politics and referendum such as changing the pounds to euros in GB , and so a overall outgrowth superpower not be valid. Also some people might be swayed with emotion and make emotional decisions instead of rational ones, for example pro and anti abortion situations. Also there might be a voters fatigue and there might be low turnouts in elections and referendums and so it might lack legitimacy .For example there was a 34% turnout to whether London should have a mayor and this results lacked legitimacy as the majority did not get involved. In conclusion I believe that there should be an increase in the greater use of direct democracy in the UK because getting the consent of the people result not only increase political participation and educate the normal but certain decisions can be strengthened by the direct consent of the people.