Sunday, January 20, 2019

Racial Profiling

This paper is deprivation to review late(a) studies on racial write and critiques galore(postnominal) of their methods. I will be development the conflict hypothesis to review a number of shipway that dusterthorn explain racial disparities in the rank of discourtesys. Also I will be utilise conflict possibleness to review how it affects pile in society. It addresses the major enigma of in qualifiedity that exists in society today. racial profile in the States is where those in assurance use of goods and services take to the woods agentive role when arresting citizens. racial indite occurs when the constabulary target individual for investigation on the butt of that mortals scat, origin, or heathenity.It has conduct practice of law agencies crosswise the world to start salt away information to the highest degree dealings and unglamorous stops. The contr all oversy over this is that all in all assumptions atomic number 18 hightail it establish. One mora l of this investigate states that police causa the use of feed to lay down decisions during traffic and pedestrian stops. The public is touch on that these decisions reflect racial prejudice, and racism. Many re expecters progress to defend theses profiles, formula that they argon based of ideal facts (Hersezenhorn, 2000 Kennedy, 1997 Taylor amp Whitney, 1999).Other experts constitute tested the accuracy of these profiles, and appease do argued that however if accurate, all decisions based wrap up race is opposed (Harris, 1997, 1999a Kennedy, 1997). there argon two meanings to racial profile. Hard racial indite uses race as the solely factor. E. g. an military policeman analyses a filthy person and places him over for a search and pat-down. flaccid racial indite is using race as one factor among otherwises in criminal suspiciousness. E. g. a report says that a Jamaican drug lord is driving a Jeep, so troopers sop up over black males who argon speeding in Je eps.Even though the driver was speeding, the reason the officer pulled him over instead of the other cars, was due(p) to his race. Minorities argon usually the ones modify by racial indite. harmonise to the public, the war on drugs immediately became a war on minorities. There is differentiate for racial profiling. One is anecdotal, which is a limited value. The other is statistical, which research is entirely worthless. any evaluation of the evidence for the use of race profiling in policing must keep the contexts distinct. Today, bark color stains you a amusing in America. You argon more possible to be topped, searched, be arrested or imprisoned. racial profiling does non besides exist in crime but in our society. People are segregated by race and ethnicity. A genuine race may think that they are wealthier than others. They as well believe that they have more indicant and education than other races. This creates a conflict amidst different races and ethnic c ategoryifys. Class rank in any case conflicts when it write outs to racial profiling. velocity class ideally has more power than pose and lower class. Thus, resulting in a group conflict. Lower and middle class urgency equal protection and power.Whites are usually in the higher(prenominal) rank, and blacks are in lower ranks. Stereotypes besides fall into the category of racial profiling. When we see psyche who is black we mechanically bring they are African. When we see soul who is Hispanic we automatically confiscate their Spanish. When we see an Asian person we automatically acquire their Chinese, and when we see a white person we exact their American. Its the bantam things like this that are considered racial profiling. Most of us dont think that its bad but someone could take it offensively. other way we use racial profiling is when we welcome mass.When you see a nice dressed to kill(p) white male you assume hes wealthy and intelligent. When you meet a black m ale, who is non dressed as nicely, you assume hes a thug, or has dropped out of school. The saying Dont judge a phonograph recording by its spawn not only works for books but for wad as well. The proletariat laws state that no one should be rancid down for a job due to disabilities or their age. Shouldnt this be the same with race, ethnic, and peel off color? In conclusion racial profiling still exists in the United States because we accept it too. It must be stopped, onwards crimes go up.We should not view as decisions off skin color or ethnic backgrounds. Weve come a retentive way and everyone should be seen as equals. Even though racial profiling exists in crimes and police stops, we should make an effort to potpourri this. There are other ways to go to the highest degree fashioning an arrest or sentencing someone to jail. Skin color, ethnic background, and religion should not be factors when decision making to arrest or pull someone over. I believe that if we make an effort to let everyone cognise that racial profiling is still mishap today we can make a balance to prevent it.References redbreast Shepard Engel, Jennifer M Calnon, Thomas J Bernard. Justice every quarter JQ. Highland high school Jun 2002. Vol. 19, Iss. 2 pg. 249, 25 pgs Katy Hurst (2008). http//www. mightystudents. com/ evidence/conflict. theory. explain. 70034 Heather mackintosh Donald (Spring 2001). The Myth of racial compose http//www. city-journal. org/hypertext markup language/11_2_the_myth. html John Reitzel, Alex R. Piquero. Does It be? Studying Citizens Attitudes of racial Profiling http//pqx. sagepub. com/content/9/2/161. mouseRacial ProfilingThis paper is going to review recent studies on racial profiling and critiques many of their methods. I will be using the conflict theory to review a number of ways that may explain racial disparities in the rates of crimes. Also I will be using conflict theory to review how it affects people in society. It addresses the major problem of inequality that exists in society today. Racial profiling in America is where those in authority use race factor when arresting citizens. Racial profiling occurs when the police target someone for investigation on the basis of that persons race, origin, or ethnicity.It has led police agencies across the world to start collecting information about traffic and pedestrian stops. The controversy over this is that all assumptions are race based. One example of this research states that police face the use of race to make decisions during traffic and pedestrian stops. The public is concerned that these decisions reflect racial prejudice, and racism. Many researchers continue to defend theses profiles, saying that they are based of accurate facts (Hersezenhorn, 2000 Kennedy, 1997 Taylor amp Whitney, 1999).Other experts have tested the accuracy of these profiles, and still have argued that even if accurate, all decisions based off race is inappropriate (Harris, 1997, 1999a Kennedy, 1997). There are two meanings to racial profiling. Hard racial profiling uses race as the only factor. E. g. an officer sees a black person and pulls him over for a search and pat-down. Soft racial profiling is using race as one factor among others in criminal suspiciousness. E. g. a report says that a Jamaican drug lord is driving a Jeep, so troopers pull over black males who are speeding in Jeeps.Even though the driver was speeding, the reason the officer pulled him over instead of the other cars, was due to his race. Minorities are usually the ones affected by racial profiling. According to the public, the war on drugs immediately became a war on minorities. There is evidence for racial profiling. One is anecdotal, which is a limited value. The other is statistical, which research is entirely worthless. Any evaluation of the evidence for the use of race profiling in policing must keep the contexts distinct. Today, skin color makes you a suspect in America. You are more l ikely to be topped, searched, be arrested or imprisoned. Racial profiling does not only exist in crime but in our society. People are segregated by race and ethnicity. A certain race may think that they are wealthier than others. They also believe that they have more power and education than other races. This creates a conflict between different races and ethnic groups. Class rank also conflicts when it comes to racial profiling. Upper class ideally has more power than middle and lower class. Thus, resulting in a group conflict. Lower and middle class want equal protection and power.Whites are usually in the higher rank, and blacks are in lower ranks. Stereotypes also fall into the category of racial profiling. When we see someone who is black we automatically assume they are African. When we see someone who is Hispanic we automatically assume their Spanish. When we see an Asian person we automatically assume their Chinese, and when we see a white person we assume their American. It s the little things like this that are considered racial profiling. Most of us dont think that its bad but someone could take it offensively. Another way we use racial profiling is when we meet people.When you see a nice dressed white male you assume hes wealthy and intelligent. When you meet a black male, who is not dressed as nicely, you assume hes a thug, or has dropped out of school. The saying Dont judge a book by its cover not only works for books but for people as well. The labor laws state that no one should be turned down for a job due to disabilities or their age. Shouldnt this be the same with race, ethnic, and skin color? In conclusion racial profiling still exists in the United States because we allow it too. It must be stopped, before crimes go up.We should not make decisions off skin color or ethnic backgrounds. Weve come a long way and everyone should be seen as equals. Even though racial profiling exists in crimes and police stops, we should make an effort to change this. There are other ways to go about making an arrest or sentencing someone to jail. Skin color, ethnic background, and religion should not be factors when deciding to arrest or pull someone over. I believe that if we make an effort to let everyone know that racial profiling is still happening today we can make a difference to prevent it.References Robin Shepard Engel, Jennifer M Calnon, Thomas J Bernard. Justice Quarterly JQ. Highland Heights Jun 2002. Vol. 19, Iss. 2 pg. 249, 25 pgs Katy Hurst (2008). http//www. mightystudents. com/essay/conflict. theory. explain. 70034 Heather Mac Donald (Spring 2001). The Myth of Racial Profiling http//www. city-journal. org/html/11_2_the_myth. html John Reitzel, Alex R. Piquero. Does It Exist? Studying Citizens Attitudes of Racial Profiling http//pqx. sagepub. com/content/9/2/161. abstractRacial ProfilingRacial Profiling Racial profiling has been around for hundreds of years and its still around, but not as bad as it use to be. Racial profil ing is wrong for many different reasons and here is why. For example, racial profiling is wrong because you cant judge someone just because their skin color isnt white. Police officers were often pulling over people of color just for the fun of it. It was humiliating to the people because it do them feel like they were nothing more than a piece of garbage. The police officers didnt take colored people seriously and just did what they wanted. They asked permission to search the car and when he refused they searched it anyway clearly states that the police had no compliancy for colored people and their feelings. Furthermore, racial profiling is wrong because it really does not matter what color skin you have, you can still be a good person at heart. Virtually everybody is innocent, and virtually everybody is not white is a true statement because its not just black and Hispanic people who are in gangs, rob stores, steal cars etc.. its white people to.It makes people feel sad and unl oved, and sometimes pushes them to a point to where they want to commit suicide. Also, it starts fights and arguments and if it goes to far, you end up getting arrested. In reality, everybody makes mistakes. All in all, I feel racial profiling is wrong because if you think about it enough and try and understand what it feels like to be constantly vexed and humiliated, you wouldnt like it either. Hopefully in the future, people stop being anti-Semite(a) and just know everybody is human and everybody has feelings.Racial ProfilingThis paper is going to review recent studies on racial profiling and critiques many of their methods. I will be using the conflict theory to review a number of ways that may explain racial disparities in the rates of crimes. Also I will be using conflict theory to review how it affects people in society. It addresses the major problem of inequality that exists in society today. Racial profiling in America is where those in authority use race factor when arre sting citizens. Racial profiling occurs when the police target someone for investigation on the basis of that persons race, origin, or ethnicity.It has led police agencies across the world to start collecting information about traffic and pedestrian stops. The controversy over this is that all assumptions are race based. One example of this research states that police face the use of race to make decisions during traffic and pedestrian stops. The public is concerned that these decisions reflect racial prejudice, and racism. Many researchers continue to defend theses profiles, saying that they are based of accurate facts (Hersezenhorn, 2000 Kennedy, 1997 Taylor amp Whitney, 1999).Other experts have tested the accuracy of these profiles, and still have argued that even if accurate, all decisions based off race is inappropriate (Harris, 1997, 1999a Kennedy, 1997). There are two meanings to racial profiling. Hard racial profiling uses race as the only factor. E. g. an officer sees a bla ck person and pulls him over for a search and pat-down. Soft racial profiling is using race as one factor among others in criminal suspiciousness. E. g. a report says that a Jamaican drug lord is driving a Jeep, so troopers pull over black males who are speeding in Jeeps.Even though the driver was speeding, the reason the officer pulled him over instead of the other cars, was due to his race. Minorities are usually the ones affected by racial profiling. According to the public, the war on drugs immediately became a war on minorities. There is evidence for racial profiling. One is anecdotal, which is a limited value. The other is statistical, which research is entirely worthless. Any evaluation of the evidence for the use of race profiling in policing must keep the contexts distinct. Today, skin color makes you a suspect in America. You are more likely to be topped, searched, be arrested or imprisoned. Racial profiling does not only exist in crime but in our society. People are segre gated by race and ethnicity. A certain race may think that they are wealthier than others. They also believe that they have more power and education than other races. This creates a conflict between different races and ethnic groups. Class rank also conflicts when it comes to racial profiling. Upper class ideally has more power than middle and lower class. Thus, resulting in a group conflict. Lower and middle class want equal protection and power.Whites are usually in the higher rank, and blacks are in lower ranks. Stereotypes also fall into the category of racial profiling. When we see someone who is black we automatically assume they are African. When we see someone who is Hispanic we automatically assume their Spanish. When we see an Asian person we automatically assume their Chinese, and when we see a white person we assume their American. Its the little things like this that are considered racial profiling. Most of us dont think that its bad but someone could take it offensivel y. Another way we use racial profiling is when we meet people.When you see a nice dressed white male you assume hes wealthy and intelligent. When you meet a black male, who is not dressed as nicely, you assume hes a thug, or has dropped out of school. The saying Dont judge a book by its cover not only works for books but for people as well. The labor laws state that no one should be turned down for a job due to disabilities or their age. Shouldnt this be the same with race, ethnic, and skin color? In conclusion racial profiling still exists in the United States because we allow it too. It must be stopped, before crimes go up.We should not make decisions off skin color or ethnic backgrounds. Weve come a long way and everyone should be seen as equals. Even though racial profiling exists in crimes and police stops, we should make an effort to change this. There are other ways to go about making an arrest or sentencing someone to jail. Skin color, ethnic background, and religion should not be factors when deciding to arrest or pull someone over. I believe that if we make an effort to let everyone know that racial profiling is still happening today we can make a difference to prevent it.References Robin Shepard Engel, Jennifer M Calnon, Thomas J Bernard. Justice Quarterly JQ. Highland Heights Jun 2002. Vol. 19, Iss. 2 pg. 249, 25 pgs Katy Hurst (2008). http//www. mightystudents. com/essay/conflict. theory. explain. 70034 Heather Mac Donald (Spring 2001). The Myth of Racial Profiling http//www. city-journal. org/html/11_2_the_myth. html John Reitzel, Alex R. Piquero. Does It Exist? Studying Citizens Attitudes of Racial Profiling http//pqx. sagepub. com/content/9/2/161. abstract

No comments:

Post a Comment