Tuesday, October 22, 2019

Bush vs. gore essays

Bush vs. gore essays In a democratic system every citizen has a chance to participate in politics and make a difference, or do they? Not too long after the founding fathers established the Constitution of the United States the Supreme Court was established to be the ultimate court of justice. For long it was the Courts approach to stay out of politics as much as possible and solely perform its duty as the ultimate legal expert. It all changed in the year two thousand when the court announced its opinion on Bush v. Gore. As the result of this particular case many people lost their faith in the system and ultimately the government and unfortunately during the years after the elections the Bushs administration make little effort to gain the public trust back. It is crucial to understand the motivations behind the Supreme Courts decision. It is important to understand and to forget that the Supreme Court of the United States dared to make such poor decision. Nevertheless it is very important to mention one more point before we study the courts opinion and that is the question of does a judge decide how a case will come out, and then find a justification in the law or does the judge approach the case with no strong prior principle and follow the legal material where they lead? In this particular case did the court want to make George W. Bush the 43rd president of the United States or was it simply a bad interpretation by the justices? Perhaps no event better illustrates the power of the United States Supreme Court than the resolution of the 2000 presidential election. Just when most people thought the separation of powers issue had been settled once and for all, the Court stepped in to adjudicate who had won the political contest. Going back in history well encounter the presidential contest of 1876 between Democrat Samuel Tilden and Republican Rutherford B. Hayes that resulted in a similar problem. Governor Samuel J...

No comments:

Post a Comment