Saturday, March 30, 2019

Are Liberty and Equality Compatible?

Are Liberty and equating Compatible? reconciling Liberty and comp atomic number 18 There agnisems to be an endless debate amongst diverse philosophers in opposite political traditions on whether or non the c at one timepts of self-sufficiency and equivalence are reconcil hurt-to doe with to(p). Some argues that the twain go together and thereof are indistinguishable while early(a)s conversely master(prenominal)tain that they are incompatible. In modern democratic societies, the twain principles ex practise to be relinquishd as they both seem to birth a communal end of evolution the capacity of an separate.The concepts of closeness and reachity seem to be in deviation due to the fact that they are derived from devil opposite ideologies which are liberalism and genialism. However, a parking lot argument is that the preservation of interdict self-reliance requires official work on on the part of the evoke or society to prevent both(prenominal) indivi duals from taking away the indecorousness of others (Berlin, 1958). Political scientist Max Dalton clearly argued that intimacy and comparability are compatible. In his article titled Are emancipation and equality compatible? he says that when well reconciled, they support a capitalistic state with few re-distri only whenive measures (Dalton, 2014).However, inorder to reconcile the two concepts, we convey to define the two terms on the outset.What is liberty? Liberty is derived from liberalism which believes in individualism. The term liberty narrowly means granting immunity, salve ordain or permissive. The doctrine of liberalism stresses that an individual has got the right to live according to his or her wishes provided that such rights do non infringe on the over whole(a) good of the community. A liberal truster does not sanction the state to constrain the freedom of an individual (Democracy integrating Programe, 2004). Liberty is contested concept. Different schola rs have defined the term liberty differently. Mill, (1993) defined the term in a negative aspect as the freedom to act and he also defined it in a negative sense as the absence of coercion. Sir Robert Firmer defined liberty as the freedom to do what one akins, to live as one wishes and not to be tied to laws. In general liberty in a negative sense, also kn let as castical liberalism, means freedom of an individual from outside compulsion or coercion. In this sense, libertarians like Nozick, (1974) argues that any form of interference, either by a coercive authority, any other person or by oneself in form of self-mastery, self-determination, self- trustworthyization or self-compulsion, is an encroachment in an individuals space of freedom. Liberalism suggests that the cracking unwashed need to be left alone to act on free will and to take responsibility for their actions. It besides suggests that a man need to be given a realm of freedom without interference. Professor Isaiah Be rlin give tongue to Liberty in the negative sense involves an answer to the question What is the scene of action within which the subjecta person or group of personsis or should be left to do or be what he is able to do or be, without interference by other persons . In this sense, negative liberty seems to be a form of rejection of any supreme creator or authority. On the extreme, the concept whitethorn be identified with a state of lawlessness. jibe to Johari, (2004) the negative view of liberty is not valuated in the present time. Johari said that this is so because the liberty of an individual is coitus to that of others because and mans action need to be viewed as both self-regarding and other people regarding.On the contrary, corroboratory liberty, also known as social liberalism, places emphasis on social body social organizations and is related to egalitarianism. In the positive sense, social liberalism asserts that an individual need to be protected from tyranny and the overbearing exercise of position. In this facet, social liberalism favors for the establishment of a social structure in a form of a minimal state that will be able to provide the necessary protection of the individuals rights. T. H. Green as quoted by (Johari, 2004) defined positive liberty as the power to of doing or enjoying roughthing that is worth doing or enjoying in relation with others. Johari (2004) grip that since man is a social creature, his spirit should be regulated by certain social bonds.This entails that liberty in its negative view favours pretermit of restraint of an individual while in its positive view, it permits the existence of a social system that exercises reasonable restraint of individuals actions inorder to go steady that noone is whollyowed to enfringe on persons liberty.Equality is derived from socialism, an ideology which believes in equality of all individuals. It stresses that all people are equal and therefore someone should not necess arily get too much at the write off of others (Democracy Consolidation Programe, 2004). In socialism, mutual interest and common good is the main principle of organizing the economy. Self-interest and too much individual accumulation of wealth result in depriving others which in turn creates inequalities. Redistribution of wealth for the pastime of common good is one key element of socialism (Democracy Consolidation Programe, 2004). Equality has narrowly been defined as the fact of being equal or the fact of having the same value. Johari, (2004) explains that equality means equal conditions guaranteed to each for making the best of themselves. In political science, the term usually means the equal intervention of people irrespective of social or cultural deviation and it takes myriad forms such as social equality, frugal equality, formal equality, licit equality, moral equality, transnational equality etc. These forms have been categorized into two main types which are shape ly positive equality and negative equality.Equality in the form of social equality is referred to as the absence of class or rank boundaries and the absence of discrimination motivated by an absolute part of a persons identity i.e. gender, race, age, sexual urgeual orientation, origin, caste or class, income or property, language, religion convictions, opinions, health or disability that whitethorn result in unequal treatment.In the egalitarian doctrine, equality is referred to as a condition in which all humans are equal in fundamental worth or social status should be treated equally in politics and economics cycles. It advocates for the removal of all economic inequality among people and this is considered to be the classical concept of socialists. Rawls, (1972) illustrates this flightiness in his Egalitarian theory of Justice where he notes that cooperation under the state is manifested in the sharing of benefits and burdens. He gain ground argues that if individuals acquire wealth at the expense of others, then they shall suffer the burden of having part of their wealth interpreted by the worst-off.Equality, may also take other form popularly known as equality before the law or level-headed egalitarian, which entails that all persons are entitled to equal treatment before the law.In a positive sense, equality means the provision of adequate opportunities for all (Johari, 2004). Johari further describes positive equality as not just nub identical treatment for all since men differ in their need and capacities for their self- increase. However, scholars have argued that the provision of adequate opportunity, does not mean equal treatment for all.Equality in its negative sense is referred to the non-discrimination on the ground of religion, caste, wealth, creed, domicile, descent, sex and the like (Johari, 2004).But how can the two terms be reconcile in modern society? The fact that the two concepts are different in principle has been clearly eluded to. But however the two concepts shares some form of similarities as they have common foundations due to the fact that they all recognize that all members within the society are free and equal. Scholars have also argued that the two concept provide egalitarian guidance on controversial questions about the distribution of social and economic resources.On the positive sense, social liberty takes the form of egalitarianism as it places emphasis on the establishment of a social structure such as a state that is able to regulate the actions of an individual so that he or she does not hamper other peoples rights and freedoms. In this sense, the two are perceived to be compactible and inseparable. This is so because positive liberties adepty appreciate the need of restraining an individual for the sake of public good as they are perceive as both self-regarding and other people regarding. In this aspect, the trust to have equality, provided like the require to enjoy negative liberties c annot be utilized without a positive state or social structure that would restrain the individual from infringing other persons liberties. Therefore, the notion that liberty implies that man need to be given total freedom may not be true in our modern society. This fact agrees with the real definition of liberty given by Johari (2004) who contended that libery is not supposed to be identified with the absence of restraints and limitation.The desire to enjoy equality destroys the possibility of having full liberties while the exercise of full liberty may degenerate into licese and equality without liberty lapses into uniformity.Liberty is superior to equality because equality serves under liberty. According to Prof. Barker Equality in all its forms, must always be subject and instrumental to the free development of capacity but if it be pressed to the length of uniformity if uniformity be made to resist the free development of capacity, the subject becomes the master, and the world is turned topsy-turvy (DasGupta, 2014).The development of a rich society requires a large measure of liberty and outlaws all attempts to enforce a dead level of social and economic equality. Liberty builds a united society but equality assesses the social hierarchy and contributes towards the stability of the community. Therefore liberty would be dull without some measure of equality and equality would be meaningless without liberty. A degraded look at most of the democratic constitutions of the world and many a(prenominal) international human rights instruments will review that both liberty and equality have been incorporated and this speaks volume to the fact that the two concepts have a common aim- and that is to develop an individual and to cast off life worth-living. Therefore, liberty without equality results in license acts beyond ones rights to abuse the rights of others and equality without liberty is dull.BibliographyBerlin, I. (1958). Two Concepts of Liberty. Oxford O xford University Press.Dalton, M. (2014, whitethorn 1). Are liberty and equality compatible? . Retrieved from oriel Web Site http// Dalton Lloyd Davies Philosophy prize Liberty.pdfDasGupta, R. (2014, May 21). Retrieved from Preserve Articles Web Site http// Consolidation Programe. (2004). Building an Informewd Nation. capital of Malawi Montifort Media.Johari, J. (2004). Principles of Modern Political Science. impertinent Dehli Sterling Publishers.Mill, J. S. (1993). On Liberty and Utilitarianism (2nd ed.). New York Bantam Books.Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York Basic Books.Rawls, J. (1972). A Theory of Justice. Oxford Oxford University Press.Wiktionary. (2014, May 15). Wiktionary The disembarrass on Line Dictionary. Retrieved from equality http// jean Valjean Les Misrables Charact er digest blue jean Valjean Les Misrables Character AnalysisThe character I have chosen for study from Bille Augusts film, Les Misrables, is Jean Valjean. As the main protagonist of the story, Valjean starts out as an ex-convict who went to prison for stealing bread, but later an encounter with a loving bishop, he makes important trades in his life. Jean Valjean went through many mental changes throughout the movie Les Misrables which inclineed him into a better person because of the grace that was extended to him by the Bishop of Digne at a time when Valjean was least deserve of it from that compass point on, he became a morally upright citizen who showed compassion and benevolence on others.Throughout the movie, Les Misrables, Jean Valjean goes through many distinct life-changing phases that permit him to grow from a loathsome of a man to a hefty man. Jean Valjeans first psychological alteration took place during his nineteen eld in prison for stealing a loaf of brea d. He went in as a wholesome and straightforward man, but came out of lock in showing hatred and scorn to society. While in prison, Valjean endured abuse and, in turn, dedicated himself to defeating related mistreatment in society. Because of cruelty shown to him there, Valjean discovered a unexampled level of physical strength and, more-so, a new emotional assimilation through his newly found cause of social justice. Whether Valjean knew it or not, he was about to undergo some other big psychological transformation that would change his life forever.The Bishop of Digne played a huge role in the psychological change of Jean Valjean, even though he was only in the film for the first couple minutes of the movie. Right off the bat, the mild bishop shows Jean something that he hasnt experienced in a couple decades the power of love and respect. When the bishop saved him from the authorities after escaping from prison, Valjean came to deeply respect his great kindness and assistance so we thought. While the bishop and his wife are sleeping, Valjean, hush stuck in his ruthless ways, starts stealing all of their silver utensils. At this point all I could think was, how could he do this to such a nice family who gave him a place to stay? But it gets crazier. The bishop hears the ruckus press release on, so he goes to check it out only to rule Jean Valjean stealing from him. Valjean ends up punching the bishop in the face, knocking him on the ground, unable to imprint as Valjean escapes. The next day, the police force caught Valjean with all the silver he had stolen, and brought him spine to the bishops house this was the turning point in Valjean.The bishop shows an act of mercy on Valjean by telling the authorities that Jean didnt steal any of that stuff, but he just simply gave it to him. This catches Valjean all told off protection he doesnt understand why the bishop would do this, so he questions him on why he saved him. The bishop responds by telling hi m something that would change his approaching forever And dont forgetdont ever forget, youve promised to become a new man. You no agelong belong to evil. With this silver, Ive bought your soul. Ive ransomed you from fear and hatred. And now I give you back to God. It was then when Valjean finally saw the brute, vile of a man he was, and the honorable, self-giving man he could become if he puts the bishops moral part into action.As nine age elapsed, Valjean was compelled towards a life of integrity, and consequently, he became a respected leader and prosperous businessman. After the city of Vigau bankrupted five age prior, Valjean decided to buy and refurbish the citys brick pulverisation. At the time of the purchase, Valjean had been named mayor of the city. seemingly Valjean wanted to make something of himself, and also wanted to help others make something of their own lives by buying, running, and offering jobs at the factory to the people of the town. This is the first, of many, psychological changes we see in Valjean since the promise he made with the bishop.Additional evidence that further supports his transformation comes in the subsequent scene where Javert and Captain Beauvais are move through Valjeans factory. Javert asks the question, The men and women work separately? Captain Beauvais answers, Yes. Monsieur le maire redesigned the factory in order to keep the sexes apart. He cares about honest workings women and wants to protect their virtue. Valjean had a high regard for women thespians despite the fact that many men did not value woman as important split in society. He says, I dont want our ladies to be exposed to corruption. This is another moral transformation that Valjean has gone through.There have been a plethora of characteristics that Valjean has adopted over the years. Another trait he embraces is compassion. Fantine, a worker in his factory who had to turn to prostitution to support her daughter after being fired without Valjea ns consent, was treated dissipatedly by men of the city and afterward unjustly accused by Javert as he sentenced Fantine to six months in prison. When Valjean heard about this, he took time out of his night to make his way down to the police station to take care of the place and set things straight. Not only does Jean set her free from jail, but he takes her into his home, just as the bishop had done for him, to care for her while she was very(prenominal) sick. He also paid to get Fantines daughter, Cosette, to be sent up to stay with him and Fantine. But before Fantine gets to see her daughter, she passes away from sickness. Valjean shows a further act of compassion by adopting Cosette and caring for her in place of her mother. These were just a few actions which demonstrated Valjeans newfound mannerism of compassion, and yet another psychological alteration in Jean.And yet Jean Valjean was still piss for more change. One day Valjean learned that a man named Jean Valjean had be en found guilty of a crime. He knew that this couldnt be true because his name was Jean Valjean. After wrestling with his conscience, he decided to attend the courtroom case where he revealed that he was the real Jean Valjean, thus let go the indicted. Valjean says to the judge, I am the man you want. I am Jean Valjean. I wish I could keep my mouth shut and let this scant(p) wretch suffer for me, but continue with the investigation monsieur. You will find further proof that I am Valjean. This was a huge finis that he made, since the authorities learn that he is an escape convict forcing Valjean to, once again, to be an absconder from the law. This means that he would have to relinquish all the things that he had accomplished in his professional life, but by acceding to a monetary standard of psychological integrity, by doing what is right and true, Valjean made one of the most affect psychological changes in his life.Sacrifice, what is it? According Websters New Collegiate Dict ionary apply is defined as, The surrender or destruction of something prized or desirable for the sake of something considered as having a higher or more pressing claim. The final sacrifice is shown towards the end of the movie which shows Valjeans true character. After several years of running from Javert and the law, Valjean find himself in an intriguing situation. Valjean has Javert, who has been trying to end his life ever since he was in jail, with his hands tied, a gun to his head, and a chance for him to finally end his life. What does he do? He simply lets him go. Valjean spares Javerts life for some very straightforward, but touching reasons. Valjean is nothing like Javert. He does not embrace the same abhorrence or the desire to win like Javert does. Jeans simply wants to live in peace. This audacious determination by Valjean exemplifies how far Jean has come since the beginning of the film. Just as the bishop showed mercy on Valjean, he also demonstrated that same act of mercy on Javert even when he least deserved it. raze today, peoples perspectives on life are changed for the better when theyve been shown acts of love, compassion, and mercy. This is depicted in Les Misrables as Jean Valjean goes through many psychological changes which shape him into, literally, a totally different person for the good. He was extended mercy when he least deserved it, and in-turn, became a morally upright citizen who showed compassion and mercy on others. I hope that through this paper youve been inspired to overcome obstacles and laboured times in your own lives and are able to use your difficulties to mold you into a better person.

No comments:

Post a Comment